Mailu vs Tine
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mailu
Simple yet full-featured Docker mail server
VS
Tine
Professional open-source groupware and CRM
| Feature | Mailu | Tine |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Groupware |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,443 | ★ 21 |
| First released | 2016 | 2007 |
| Replaces | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 | Microsoft 365, Google Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose Tine if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in HTML
Frequently asked questions
Is Mailu or Tine better?
Neither is universally better. Mailu has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Mailu and Tine free and open-source?
Yes. Mailu is licensed under MIT and Tine under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mailu and Tine with Docker?
Mailu: yes. Tine: yes.