Mailpile vs Himalaya
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mailpile
Privacy-focused, searchable email client
VS
Himalaya
Modern command-line email client written in Rust
| Feature | Mailpile | Himalaya |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,825 | ★ 6,962 |
| First released | 2013 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Gmail | Mutt, Outlook |
Why pick each one
Choose Mailpile if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 8.8k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Himalaya if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 7k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Mailpile or Himalaya better?
Neither is universally better. Mailpile has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Mailpile and Himalaya free and open-source?
Yes. Mailpile is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Himalaya under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mailpile and Himalaya with Docker?
Mailpile: check the project docs for container support. Himalaya: check the project docs for container support.