Mail-in-a-Box vs Citadel

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMail-in-a-BoxCitadel
CategoryMail ServersGroupware
LicenseCC0-1.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonC
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, one-clickbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 15,385★ 100
First released20141987
ReplacesGoogle Workspace, Microsoft 365Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft 365

Why pick each one

Choose Mail-in-a-Box if…

  • Very beginner-friendly
  • Opinionated, complete stack
Mail-in-a-Box details

Choose Citadel if…

  • Single-package setup
  • Low resource needs
Citadel details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mail-in-a-Box or Citadel better?

Mail-in-a-Box is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Citadel if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Mail-in-a-Box and Citadel free and open-source?

Yes. Mail-in-a-Box is licensed under CC0-1.0 and Citadel under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mail-in-a-Box and Citadel with Docker?

Mail-in-a-Box: check the project docs for container support. Citadel: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons