Cuttlefish vs Docker Mailserver
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cuttlefish
Transactional email server with click and open tracking
VS
Docker Mailserver
Production-ready, config-driven mail server in a container
| Feature | Cuttlefish | Docker Mailserver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,624 | ★ 18,682 |
| First released | 2014 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Mailgun, SendGrid, Postmark | Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 |
Why pick each one
Choose Cuttlefish if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Choose Docker Mailserver if…
- Reproducible, version-controllable config
- Lightweight
Frequently asked questions
Is Cuttlefish or Docker Mailserver better?
Neither is universally better. Docker Mailserver has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Cuttlefish and Docker Mailserver free and open-source?
Yes. Cuttlefish is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Docker Mailserver under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cuttlefish and Docker Mailserver with Docker?
Cuttlefish: yes. Docker Mailserver: yes.