ElkarBackup vs Velero
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ElkarBackup
Web-based backup solution built on rsync
VS
Velero
Backup and migrate Kubernetes cluster resources
| Feature | ElkarBackup | Velero |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 415 | ★ 10,187 |
| First released | 2014 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Carbonite | Kasten K10 |
Why pick each one
Choose Velero if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is ElkarBackup or Velero better?
Neither is universally better. Velero has the larger community, while ElkarBackup is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ElkarBackup and Velero free and open-source?
Yes. ElkarBackup is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Velero under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ElkarBackup and Velero with Docker?
ElkarBackup: yes. Velero: check the project docs for container support.