Element Web vs Tox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Element Web
Glossy Matrix client for the web and desktop
VS
Tox
Peer-to-peer encrypted messaging protocol and core
| Feature | Element Web | Tox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,353 | ★ 2,670 |
| First released | 2016 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams | Skype, Discord |
Why pick each one
Choose Tox if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Element Web or Tox better?
Element Web is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tox if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Element Web and Tox free and open-source?
Yes. Element Web is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Element Web and Tox with Docker?
Element Web: yes. Tox: check the project docs for container support.