Element Web vs irssi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Element Web
Glossy Matrix client for the web and desktop
VS
irssi
Modular terminal IRC client with scripting
| Feature | Element Web | irssi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,353 | ★ 3,129 |
| First released | 2016 | 1999 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams | Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose irssi if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Element Web or irssi better?
Element Web is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider irssi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Element Web and irssi free and open-source?
Yes. Element Web is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and irssi under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Element Web and irssi with Docker?
Element Web: yes. irssi: check the project docs for container support.