Element vs Snikket
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Element
A glossy Matrix client compatible with Synapse
VS
Snikket
Easy self-hosted XMPP chat for groups
| Feature | Element | Snikket |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | free | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Lua |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,353 | ★ 437 |
| First released | 2022 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | WhatsApp, Signal |
Why pick each one
Choose Element if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 13.4k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Element or Snikket better?
Neither is universally better. Element has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Element and Snikket free and open-source?
Yes. Element is licensed under free and Snikket under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Element and Snikket with Docker?
Element: yes. Snikket: yes.