Ech0 vs Harp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ech0
Lightweight federated publishing platform focused on personal idea
VS
Harp
Static web server with built-in preprocessing
| Feature | Ech0 | Harp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | source, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,035 | ★ 4,995 |
| First released | 2026 | 2013 |
| Replaces | — | Jekyll |
Why pick each one
Choose Ech0 if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
Choose Harp if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (5k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Ech0 or Harp better?
Harp is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ech0 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ech0 and Harp free and open-source?
Yes. Ech0 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Harp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ech0 and Harp with Docker?
Ech0: yes. Harp: check the project docs for container support.