EasyTier vs SoftEther VPN

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEasyTierSoftEther VPN
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRustC
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerbare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 13,019★ 13,447
First released20242014
ReplacesTailscale, ZeroTierCisco AnyConnect

Why pick each one

Choose EasyTier if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 13k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
EasyTier details

Choose SoftEther VPN if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 13.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
SoftEther VPN details

Frequently asked questions

Is EasyTier or SoftEther VPN better?

Neither is universally better. SoftEther VPN has the larger community, while EasyTier is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are EasyTier and SoftEther VPN free and open-source?

Yes. EasyTier is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SoftEther VPN under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run EasyTier and SoftEther VPN with Docker?

EasyTier: yes. SoftEther VPN: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons