SHSelfHostIndex

Vorta vs Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
VO Vorta Desktop backup client built on BorgBackup VS BA Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup Time Machine-style backups for Linux and macOS using rsync
FeatureVortaBackup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonShell
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB32 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 2,490★ 3,608
First released20182014
ReplacesTime Machine, CrashPlanTime Machine

Why pick each one

Choose Vorta if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Vorta details

Choose Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Vorta or Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup better?

Neither is universally better. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Vorta and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup free and open-source?

Yes. Vorta is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Vorta and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup with Docker?

Vorta: check the project docs for container support. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons