DumbDrop vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDumbDropSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM70 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 561★ 33,952
First released20252015
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose DumbDrop if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 70 MB RAM
DumbDrop details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is DumbDrop or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while DumbDrop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are DumbDrop and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. DumbDrop is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DumbDrop and SeaweedFS with Docker?

DumbDrop: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons