DumbDrop vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDumbDropPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM70 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 561★ 43,003
First released20252026
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose DumbDrop if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 70 MB RAM
DumbDrop details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is DumbDrop or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while DumbDrop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are DumbDrop and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. DumbDrop is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run DumbDrop and Puter with Docker?

DumbDrop: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons