Dozzle vs Zipkin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dozzle
Real-time log viewer for Docker containers
VS
Zipkin
Distributed tracing system for latency troubleshooting
| Feature | Dozzle | Zipkin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,984 | ★ 17,452 |
| First released | 2018 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Datadog Logs | Datadog APM |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dozzle or Zipkin better?
Neither is universally better. Zipkin has the larger community, while Dozzle is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dozzle and Zipkin free and open-source?
Yes. Dozzle is licensed under MIT and Zipkin under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dozzle and Zipkin with Docker?
Dozzle: yes. Zipkin: yes.