Dozzle vs Telegraf
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dozzle
Real-time log viewer for Docker containers
VS
Telegraf
Plugin-driven server agent for collecting metrics
| Feature | Dozzle | Telegraf |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,984 | ★ 17,736 |
| First released | 2018 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Datadog Logs | Datadog Agent |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dozzle or Telegraf better?
Neither is universally better. Telegraf has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Dozzle and Telegraf free and open-source?
Yes. Dozzle is licensed under MIT and Telegraf under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dozzle and Telegraf with Docker?
Dozzle: yes. Telegraf: yes.