Paymenter vs FossBilling
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Paymenter
Open-source billing and client management for hosting
VS
FossBilling
Solution for efficient billing and client management for hosting
| Feature | Paymenter | FossBilling |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,193 | ★ 1,667 |
| First released | 2023 | 2026 |
| Replaces | WHMCS, Blesta | WHMCS |
Why pick each one
Choose Paymenter if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
Choose FossBilling if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Paymenter or FossBilling better?
Neither is universally better. Paymenter has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Paymenter and FossBilling free and open-source?
Yes. Paymenter is licensed under MIT and FossBilling under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Paymenter and FossBilling with Docker?
Paymenter: yes. FossBilling: check the project docs for container support.