Distribution vs lazygit

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDistributionlazygit
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 10,553★ 81,130
First released20152018
ReplacesDocker HubGitKraken, Sourcetree

Why pick each one

Choose Distribution if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
Distribution details

Choose lazygit if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 81.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazygit details

Frequently asked questions

Is Distribution or lazygit better?

Neither is universally better. lazygit has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Distribution and lazygit free and open-source?

Yes. Distribution is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazygit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Distribution and lazygit with Docker?

Distribution: yes. lazygit: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons