Directus vs Plasmic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDirectusPlasmic
CategorySelf-Hosting Platforms (PaaS)Content Management Systems
LicenseBSL-1.1MIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, source
GitHub stars★ 37,238★ 6,945
First released20152021
ReplacesContentful, FirebaseWebflow, Contentful

Why pick each one

Choose Directus if…

  • Released under the BSL-1.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 37.2k GitHub stars
Directus details

Choose Plasmic if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Plasmic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Directus or Plasmic better?

Directus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Plasmic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Directus and Plasmic free and open-source?

Yes. Directus is licensed under BSL-1.1 and Plasmic under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Directus and Plasmic with Docker?

Directus: yes. Plasmic: yes.

Related comparisons