dir2opds vs KOReader

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuredir2opdsKOReader
CategoryE-books & Media LibraryE-books & Media Library
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoLua
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 110★ 28,800
First released20182012
ReplacesCalibre Content ServerKindle, Pocketbook reader

Why pick each one

Choose dir2opds if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
dir2opds details

Choose KOReader if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 28.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Lua
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
KOReader details

Frequently asked questions

Is dir2opds or KOReader better?

Neither is universally better. KOReader has the larger community, while dir2opds is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are dir2opds and KOReader free and open-source?

Yes. dir2opds is licensed under MIT and KOReader under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run dir2opds and KOReader with Docker?

dir2opds: yes. KOReader: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons