Dillinger vs TriliumNext Notes
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dillinger
Cloud-enabled Markdown editor you can self-host
VS
TriliumNext Notes
Cross-platform hierarchical note taking application with focus on
| Feature | Dillinger | TriliumNext Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,271 | ★ 37,298 |
| First released | 2012 | 2026 |
| Replaces | StackEdit | — |
Why pick each one
Choose TriliumNext Notes if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 37.3k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Dillinger or TriliumNext Notes better?
Neither is universally better. TriliumNext Notes has the larger community, while Dillinger is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Dillinger and TriliumNext Notes free and open-source?
Yes. Dillinger is licensed under MIT and TriliumNext Notes under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dillinger and TriliumNext Notes with Docker?
Dillinger: yes. TriliumNext Notes: yes.