Delta Chat vs Quicksy Bridge
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Delta Chat
Decentralized messenger built on top of email
VS
Quicksy Bridge
XMPP gateway providing phone-number based messaging
| Feature | Delta Chat | Quicksy Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 916 | ★ 3,000 |
| First released | 2017 | 2018 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram | WhatsApp, Signal |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Delta Chat or Quicksy Bridge better?
Neither is universally better. Quicksy Bridge has the larger community, while Delta Chat is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Delta Chat and Quicksy Bridge free and open-source?
Yes. Delta Chat is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Quicksy Bridge under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Delta Chat and Quicksy Bridge with Docker?
Delta Chat: check the project docs for container support. Quicksy Bridge: yes.