DebOps vs Stalwart Mail Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
DebOps
Your Debian-based data center in a box
VS
Stalwart Mail Server
Modern all-in-one mail server in a single binary
| Feature | DebOps | Stalwart Mail Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Jinja | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,416 | ★ 14,059 |
| First released | 2026 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Microsoft Exchange, Google Workspace |
Why pick each one
Choose DebOps if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Jinja
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Stalwart Mail Server if…
- Single modern binary
- Strong security defaults
Frequently asked questions
Is DebOps or Stalwart Mail Server better?
Neither is universally better. Stalwart Mail Server has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are DebOps and Stalwart Mail Server free and open-source?
Yes. DebOps is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Stalwart Mail Server under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run DebOps and Stalwart Mail Server with Docker?
DebOps: check the project docs for container support. Stalwart Mail Server: yes.