darktable vs File Browser

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturedarktableFile Browser
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, snapdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 12,904★ 35,800
First released20092017
ReplacesAdobe LightroomDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose darktable if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 12.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in C
darktable details

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Frequently asked questions

Is darktable or File Browser better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider darktable if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are darktable and File Browser free and open-source?

Yes. darktable is licensed under GPL-3.0 and File Browser under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run darktable and File Browser with Docker?

darktable: check the project docs for container support. File Browser: yes.

Related comparisons