Danbooru vs Photoview
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Danbooru
Self-hostable tag-based image board and gallery
VS
Photoview
Simple photo gallery for personal servers
| Feature | Danbooru | Photoview |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,776 | ★ 6,496 |
| First released | 2005 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Eagle | Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Danbooru or Photoview better?
Photoview is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Danbooru if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Danbooru and Photoview free and open-source?
Yes. Danbooru is licensed under MIT and Photoview under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Danbooru and Photoview with Docker?
Danbooru: yes. Photoview: yes.