Danbooru vs Lychee
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Danbooru
Self-hostable tag-based image board and gallery
VS
Lychee
Self-hosted photo management made easy
| Feature | Danbooru | Lychee |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,776 | ★ 4,255 |
| First released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Eagle | Google Photos, Flickr |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Danbooru or Lychee better?
Lychee is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Danbooru if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Danbooru and Lychee free and open-source?
Yes. Danbooru is licensed under MIT and Lychee under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Danbooru and Lychee with Docker?
Danbooru: yes. Lychee: yes.