Danbooru vs Immich
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Danbooru
Self-hostable tag-based image board and gallery
VS
Immich
High-performance self-hosted photo and video backup
| Feature | Danbooru | Immich |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,776 | ★ 109,945 |
| First released | 2005 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Eagle | Google Photos, iCloud Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Danbooru or Immich better?
Immich is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Danbooru if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Danbooru and Immich free and open-source?
Yes. Danbooru is licensed under MIT and Immich under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Danbooru and Immich with Docker?
Danbooru: yes. Immich: yes.