Danbooru vs Immich Kiosk
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Danbooru
Self-hostable tag-based image board and gallery
VS
Immich Kiosk
Lightweight slideshow for running on kiosk devices and browsers that
| Feature | Danbooru | Immich Kiosk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,776 | ★ 1,622 |
| First released | 2005 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Eagle | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Immich Kiosk if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Danbooru or Immich Kiosk better?
Neither is universally better. Danbooru has the larger community, while Immich Kiosk is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Danbooru and Immich Kiosk free and open-source?
Yes. Danbooru is licensed under MIT and Immich Kiosk under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Danbooru and Immich Kiosk with Docker?
Danbooru: yes. Immich Kiosk: yes.