Shotwell Server vs gallery-dl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Shotwell Server
Digital photo organizer with tagging and event grouping
VS
gallery-dl
Command-line tool to download image galleries from websites
| Feature | Shotwell Server | gallery-dl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Vala | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 400 | ★ 19,143 |
| First released | 2009 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, Apple Photos | Manual downloads |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Shotwell Server or gallery-dl better?
Neither is universally better. gallery-dl has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Shotwell Server and gallery-dl free and open-source?
Yes. Shotwell Server is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and gallery-dl under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Shotwell Server and gallery-dl with Docker?
Shotwell Server: check the project docs for container support. gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support.