CyTube vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCyTubeSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageJavaScriptC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 1,576★ 29,105
First released20172025
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose CyTube if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CyTube details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is CyTube or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are CyTube and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. CyTube is licensed under MIT and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CyTube and SRS with Docker?

CyTube: check the project docs for container support. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons