Cyrus IMAP vs Mailpit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cyrus IMAP
Scalable IMAP and POP server for large deployments
VS
Mailpit
Email and SMTP testing tool with web UI
| Feature | Cyrus IMAP | Mailpit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 641 | ★ 10,067 |
| First released | 1994 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange | Mailtrap, MailHog |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Cyrus IMAP or Mailpit better?
Mailpit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Cyrus IMAP if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cyrus IMAP and Mailpit free and open-source?
Yes. Cyrus IMAP is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Mailpit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cyrus IMAP and Mailpit with Docker?
Cyrus IMAP: check the project docs for container support. Mailpit: yes.