CyberChef vs Hoppscotch

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCyberChefHoppscotch
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 35,539★ 79,994
First released20162019
ReplacesIT-ToolsPostman, Insomnia

Why pick each one

Choose CyberChef if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 35.5k GitHub stars
CyberChef details

Choose Hoppscotch if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
Hoppscotch details

Frequently asked questions

Is CyberChef or Hoppscotch better?

Neither is universally better. Hoppscotch has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are CyberChef and Hoppscotch free and open-source?

Yes. CyberChef is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Hoppscotch under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CyberChef and Hoppscotch with Docker?

CyberChef: yes. Hoppscotch: yes.

Related comparisons