Cube vs Statusnook
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted dashboards & startpages options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cube
Semantic layer and headless BI for building data apps
VS
Statusnook
Effortless self-hosted status page and monitoring dashboard
| Feature | Cube | Statusnook |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dashboards & Startpages | Dashboards & Startpages |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,572 | ★ 976 |
| First released | 2019 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Looker, AtScale | StatusPage, Instatus |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Cube or Statusnook better?
Neither is universally better. Cube has the larger community, while Statusnook is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cube and Statusnook free and open-source?
Yes. Cube is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Statusnook under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cube and Statusnook with Docker?
Cube: yes. Statusnook: yes.