Cube vs Flemmarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted dashboards & startpages options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cube
Semantic layer and headless BI for building data apps
VS
Flemmarr
Self-hosted application dashboard with widget integrations
| Feature | Cube | Flemmarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dashboards & Startpages | Dashboards & Startpages |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, source | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,572 | ★ 822 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Looker, AtScale | Google homepage |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Cube or Flemmarr better?
Neither is universally better. Cube has the larger community, while Flemmarr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cube and Flemmarr free and open-source?
Yes. Cube is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Flemmarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cube and Flemmarr with Docker?
Cube: yes. Flemmarr: yes.