Cube vs Flame
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted dashboards & startpages options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cube
Semantic layer and headless BI for building data apps
VS
Flame
Minimalist self-hosted start page
| Feature | Cube | Flame |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dashboards & Startpages | Dashboards & Startpages |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,572 | ★ 6,503 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Looker, AtScale | Heimdall |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Cube or Flame better?
Neither is universally better. Cube has the larger community, while Flame is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cube and Flame free and open-source?
Yes. Cube is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Flame under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cube and Flame with Docker?
Cube: yes. Flame: yes.