Cube vs Dockpeek
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted dashboards & startpages options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cube
Semantic layer and headless BI for building data apps
VS
Dockpeek
Dashboard that auto-discovers Docker container links
| Feature | Cube | Dockpeek |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dashboards & Startpages | Dashboards & Startpages |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,572 | ★ 1,982 |
| First released | 2019 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Looker, AtScale | Heimdall |
Why pick each one
Choose Dockpeek if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Cube or Dockpeek better?
Neither is universally better. Cube has the larger community, while Dockpeek is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Cube and Dockpeek free and open-source?
Yes. Cube is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Dockpeek under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cube and Dockpeek with Docker?
Cube: yes. Dockpeek: yes.