CrowdSec vs OAuth2 Proxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCrowdSecOAuth2 Proxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 14,461★ 14,808
First released20202015
ReplacesCloudflare WAF, Fail2banCloudflare Access

Why pick each one

Choose CrowdSec if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 14.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
CrowdSec details

Choose OAuth2 Proxy if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 14.8k GitHub stars
OAuth2 Proxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is CrowdSec or OAuth2 Proxy better?

Neither is universally better. OAuth2 Proxy has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are CrowdSec and OAuth2 Proxy free and open-source?

Yes. CrowdSec is licensed under MIT and OAuth2 Proxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CrowdSec and OAuth2 Proxy with Docker?

CrowdSec: yes. OAuth2 Proxy: yes.

Related comparisons