SHSelfHostIndex

CrowdSec vs Ingress-NGINX

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CR CrowdSec Collaborative open-source intrusion prevention system VS IN Ingress-NGINX Kubernetes ingress controller using NGINX
FeatureCrowdSecIngress-NGINX
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarykubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 14,461★ 19,485
First released20202016
ReplacesCloudflare WAF, Fail2banAWS ALB Ingress

Why pick each one

Choose CrowdSec if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 14.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
CrowdSec details

Choose Ingress-NGINX if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 19.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Ingress-NGINX details

Frequently asked questions

Is CrowdSec or Ingress-NGINX better?

Neither is universally better. Ingress-NGINX has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are CrowdSec and Ingress-NGINX free and open-source?

Yes. CrowdSec is licensed under MIT and Ingress-NGINX under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CrowdSec and Ingress-NGINX with Docker?

CrowdSec: yes. Ingress-NGINX: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons