croc vs WebDAV Server Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocWebDAV Server Go
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 5,750
First released20182017
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose WebDAV Server Go if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
WebDAV Server Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or WebDAV Server Go better?

Neither is universally better. croc has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and WebDAV Server Go free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and WebDAV Server Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and WebDAV Server Go with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. WebDAV Server Go: yes.

Related comparisons