croc vs Syncthing-Fork

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocSyncthing-Fork
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageGoJava
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 2,534
First released20182017
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Syncthing-Fork if…

  • Actively maintained
  • No central server needed
Syncthing-Fork details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Syncthing-Fork better?

Neither is universally better. croc has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and Syncthing-Fork free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Syncthing-Fork under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Syncthing-Fork with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing-Fork: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons