croc vs Firefox SyncStorage

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocFirefox SyncStorage
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB50 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 1,784
First released20182023
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Firefox SyncStorage if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
Firefox SyncStorage details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Firefox SyncStorage better?

Neither is universally better. croc has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and Firefox SyncStorage free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Firefox SyncStorage under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Firefox SyncStorage with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Firefox SyncStorage: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons