croc vs SparkleShare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocSparkleShare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC#
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 4,971
First released20182010
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose SparkleShare if…

  • Full history of every change
  • Works over plain SSH
SparkleShare details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or SparkleShare better?

croc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SparkleShare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are croc and SparkleShare free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and SparkleShare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and SparkleShare with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. SparkleShare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons