croc vs Sharry

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocSharry
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoElm
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 1,338
First released20182025
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Sharry if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Elm
Sharry details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Sharry better?

croc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Sharry if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are croc and Sharry free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Sharry under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Sharry with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Sharry: yes.

Related comparisons