croc vs QuickShare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocQuickShare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITLGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 634
First released20182026
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDrop

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose QuickShare if…

  • Released under the LGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
QuickShare details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or QuickShare better?

croc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider QuickShare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are croc and QuickShare free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and QuickShare under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and QuickShare with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. QuickShare: yes.

Related comparisons