croc vs Kopia

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocKopia
CategoryFile Sync & StorageBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 13,798
First released20182019
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Kopia if…

  • GUI and CLI both available
  • Fast and efficient
  • Modern design
Kopia details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Kopia better?

Neither is universally better. croc has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are croc and Kopia free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Kopia under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Kopia with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Kopia: yes.

Related comparisons