Crawl4AI vs Hatchet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Crawl4AI
Open-source web crawler built for LLM data pipelines
VS
Hatchet
Distributed background task queue with a modern UI
| Feature | Crawl4AI | Hatchet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 77,226 | ★ 7,685 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Firecrawl | Celery, Temporal |
Why pick each one
Choose Crawl4AI if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 77.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Choose Hatchet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Crawl4AI or Hatchet better?
Neither is universally better. Crawl4AI has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Crawl4AI and Hatchet free and open-source?
Yes. Crawl4AI is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Hatchet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Crawl4AI and Hatchet with Docker?
Crawl4AI: yes. Hatchet: yes.