Crater vs Cashew Self-Host

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCraterCashew Self-Host
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseAALMIT
LanguagePHPDart
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 8,338★ 4,533
First released20202022
ReplacesFreshBooks, InvoicelyYNAB, Mint

Why pick each one

Choose Crater if…

  • Clean modern interface
  • Free mobile apps
Crater details

Choose Cashew Self-Host if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.5k GitHub stars)
Cashew Self-Host details

Frequently asked questions

Is Crater or Cashew Self-Host better?

Neither is universally better. Crater has the larger community, while Cashew Self-Host is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Crater and Cashew Self-Host free and open-source?

Yes. Crater is licensed under AAL and Cashew Self-Host under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Crater and Cashew Self-Host with Docker?

Crater: yes. Cashew Self-Host: yes.

Related comparisons