Coral vs Lobsters
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted forums & community options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Coral
Open-source commenting platform for newsrooms
VS
Lobsters
Computing-focused link aggregation and discussion site
| Feature | Coral | Lobsters |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Forums & Community | Forums & Community |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,996 | ★ 4,814 |
| First released | 2016 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Disqus, Facebook Comments | Reddit, Hacker News |
Why pick each one
Choose Coral if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Lobsters if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Active community (4.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Coral or Lobsters better?
Neither is universally better. Lobsters has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Coral and Lobsters free and open-source?
Yes. Coral is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Lobsters under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Coral and Lobsters with Docker?
Coral: yes. Lobsters: check the project docs for container support.