Continue vs Text Generation Inference

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureContinueText Generation Inference
CategoryLocal LLM RunnersLocal LLM Runners
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB16,384 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 35,374★ 10,888
First released20232022
ReplacesGitHub Copilot, CursorOpenAI API

Why pick each one

Choose Continue if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 35.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Continue details

Choose Text Generation Inference if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 10.9k GitHub stars
Text Generation Inference details

Frequently asked questions

Is Continue or Text Generation Inference better?

Continue is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Text Generation Inference if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Continue and Text Generation Inference free and open-source?

Yes. Continue is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Text Generation Inference under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Continue and Text Generation Inference with Docker?

Continue: check the project docs for container support. Text Generation Inference: yes.

Related comparisons