Continue vs One API

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureContinueOne API
CategoryLocal LLM RunnersLocal LLM Runners
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,374★ 36,253
First released20232023
ReplacesGitHub Copilot, CursorOpenAI API, OpenRouter

Why pick each one

Choose Continue if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 35.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Continue details

Choose One API if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 36.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
One API details

Frequently asked questions

Is Continue or One API better?

Neither is universally better. One API has the larger community, while Continue is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Continue and One API free and open-source?

Yes. Continue is licensed under Apache-2.0 and One API under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Continue and One API with Docker?

Continue: check the project docs for container support. One API: yes.

Related comparisons