Conduit vs Maubot
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conduit
Simple, fast and reliable Matrix homeserver in Rust
VS
Maubot
Plugin-based bot framework for Matrix chat rooms
| Feature | Conduit | Maubot |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,200 | ★ 891 |
| First released | 2020 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Slack bots |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Conduit or Maubot better?
Conduit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Maubot if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Conduit and Maubot free and open-source?
Yes. Conduit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Maubot under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conduit and Maubot with Docker?
Conduit: yes. Maubot: yes.